“What voices get heard; what perspectives get
listened to? When we speak, from what perspectives do we speak and to what
extent do we acknowledge these?”
“How exclusive these forums are… How are we
making sure that we acknowledge our privileges?”
The strength of the
Cradle of Creativity ASSITEJ 2017 festival was that it included many different, less
privileged voices in the debate and ensured that the debate was not just in the
centre of the city but also in the Township cultural hubs.
English delegates have
the particular perspective of working in the context of Brexit and with the Arts
Council England’s Creative Case for Diversity. This was highlighted by Erwin Mass and Liz O’Neill.
The questions below are
drawn from the excellent facilitators, speakers and delegates too numerous to
mention by name.
- Is difference a better word than diversity?
- The etymology of diversity means ‘to turn
aside’, is not ‘inclusion’ the approach we want?
- What are the feelings attached to not being
included?
- If we look at the UK
in the context of ‘inclusion,’ is the Brexit vote to exclude ourselves from
Europe because we do not feel included?
- How do we ensure both quality and diversity?
- To what degree does relevance and intention
inform excellence in art?
- Is it a myth that children are somehow
innocent and outside concerns of difference and identity?
- How do we normalise difference?
- How do we talk about diversity in Central Africa
where Cameroon has 250 different languages? (in addition to the 2 primary
colonial languages)
- How is wisdom found in many different places?
It is not useful to close down the debate
or draw conclusions, but to note how setting of Capetown provided the African
and global dimension to open up a wide intercultural exchange on the theme.
No comments:
Post a Comment